Thursday, September 29, 2011

Letter to CM on 23/9/11 - Proposed Elevated Metro – II corridor – Charkop – Bandra Mankhurd.


23rd Sept, 2011
To,
Shri Prithviraj Chavan
Hon’ble  Chief Minister,
Maharashtra State,
Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.

Sub: Proposed Elevated Metro – II corridor – Charkop – Bandra Mankhurd.

Sir,

 As you are aware the above Metro – II contemplates to construct 32 km. elevated Metro Rail from Charkop to Mankhurd via Bandra.  There are seventeen Metro Stations en-route.  The proposal also includes construction of 4000 m2  of  commercial area above each Metro Station and the rails are to be laid on an elevated via – duct connecting these stations.  For upkeep and maintenance of the rolling stock, it is proposed to construct two terminal Metro Yards with workshops and allied activities.  Each station spreads over 180m X 30 m. area with height of 80’ to 100’ inclusive of the height of commercial area.  The said commercial area of 43000 sq.ft. is on the existing road and is not  approvable under the Development Control Regulations of Greater Mumbai 1991.  The total construction of the elevated Metro Rail – II spreads over an area of approximately 10,00,000 m2, (1,07,64,000 sq.ft.) (Built-up area) which includes station area with commercial area of about 3,50,000 m2, (37,75,000 sq.ft.) viz – duct area 3,50,000 m2  (37,75,000 sq.ft.) and about 3,00,000m2 (32,30,000 sq.ft.) of Metro yards.

At the outset it is to be submitted that the elevated Metro Rail as proposed in the present scheme is totally non-practical and misconceived considering the existing ground realities in Mumbai in as much as that  the elevated Metro is proposed to be constructed on  narrow roads that are encroached over long stretches and which are very heavily congested even now.  Truly, if the project is implemented in its present form, it will devastate the life of millions of citizens of the Western and Eastern Suburbs and permanent destruction of the locality of these suburbs  through which

Metro – II will ply.  The project is not in public interest at all and in fact it will adversely affect the lives  and properties of millions of citizens of the city.  It suffers from grave / serious technical / planning flaws together with legal infirmities that are high  lighted hereunder.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->1.    <!--[endif]-->    The to be constructed Metro – II runs at the centre of the already heavily congested roads having comparatively narrow width of 90’ to 120’ inclusive of the footpaths and central dividers as also encroachments at several long stretches and these widths were prescribed considering the need of vehicular traffic at the material time and future increase of vehicular traffic and constructing Flyovers.  It was never contemplated to use these roads to erect huge structures of fire ducts and stations of an elevated Metro Rail.  In fact on account of easy availability of cars and the affordability  of the public more and more vehicles are being added on these roads and that too much beyond estimated increase.  Even at present these roads are being utilized beyond their capacity.  Vehicles literally crawl on these roads at peak hours.  At places and for long distances the road width is lesser than 90’ because of encroachments thereon.  Only 9 k.m. runs on 120’ road and the remaining 23 k.m. ply on road 90’ or less width due to encroachments.  Even the 120’ wide Link Road starting from JVPD Scheme upto Marve Road is heavily congested.  All these stretches including 120’ Link road stated above experience traffic snarls even at present  in the morning and evening peak hours; speed of travel of motor vehicles drops down to 8 km / 9 km per hour all along the Link Road.  It is actually verified by car driving that it takes during the peak evening hours almost two hours to go from Bandra to Malad (West) along the road on which Metro – II is to be constructed.  Motorists as well as commuters in buses travelling  on these roads get exhausted and tired with fatigue, which speaks on their health and efficiency.  Pedestrians especially ladies, children, elderly are unable to cross the road for long time and have to jostle with vehicular traffic at times leading serious fatal accidents, which are increasing day by day as shown by statistics of Traffic Department.  Pedestrians are forced to walk on the carriage ways at many places either on account of missing footpaths or encroachment in these footpaths by hawkers autos and taxis parked to pick up passengers or drop them all along these roads for long stretches and telephone / electrical boxes.

It will be disastrous for the citizens of the Western and Eastern Suburbs if massive columns with their protective anti-crash devices all around are constructed for the elevated Metro Rail at the Centre of these permanently busy roads as they will take away two traffic lanes (one  in each direction) from the existing carriageway.  Taxis/Rickshaws, private and public buses, vehicles – all will suffer from the aggravated traffic congestion.  The present average 8/9 k.m./hour speed of travel will reduce to half i.e. 4 to 4.5 per hour and the travel time will consequently double leading to exhaustion of the motorists, public transport drivers, buses, ambulances etc.  The fuel consumption will be exorbitant -  this will be national waste of scarce commodity.  In such traffic scenario even Fire Engine and Ambulances will not be able to ply on these roads in response to “Fire Call” of citizens resulting in colossal damage / destruction of life and property of the public.  The number of vehicles that ply on these roads is increasing day by day on account of rapid growth  in population of these Suburbs and this will continue in the future.
      Pedestrians safety is also of huge concern in this regard since statistics show that they form major component of road fatalities in Mumbai.  Construction work on road forces pedestrian on to roads which leads to several accidents.  What will be the fate of pedestrians if the road carriageway is reduced is for anyone to imagine.  Are they  to be treated as “forgotten citizens” and ignored and left to jostle with vehicular traffic and fend themselves ? Children and elderly citizens will suffer the most.

<!--[if !supportLists]-->2.    <!--[endif]-->      Somewhere in 2003 MMRDA had carried out survey and prepared MUIP Scheme to give some relief to vehicular traffic in the Western Suburbs.  The objective of the study was to provide a signal free ride to motorists from Bandra to Dahisar.  It was decided to construct several flyovers on these roads at the junctions of the important roads so that the flyovers can provide a signal free journey to reduce travel time and give consequents relief to the motorists and commuters in buses, taxis, etc. apart from saving fuel and protect their health.  The efficacy of construction such flyovers is confirmed by the flyovers constructed along the Western Express Highway and Eastern Express Highway where the time of travel from Bandra to Borivali and Sion to Thane has reduced to half now because of these flyovers providing signal free drive. Also the Metro Rails, whenever proposed / constructed are provided underground and never on existing roads within the City Area. In Chennai the proposed Metro Rail to run though Urban area is to be constructed underground and it is proposed elevated only in the areas outside the City.  Similarly in all Metro Cities in China like Bejing and Shanghai such Metro Rails ply underground and efficiently.  Elevated Metro – II will forever eliminate the possibility of constructing flyovers to ease traffics in the Western Suburbs in the future.  No relief will then be possible to be provided to the ever increasing vehicular traffic on the road below.  This is very important aspect of Judicious planning for future traffic increase in the Western Suburbs has been ignored and overlooked by Elevated Metro – II proponents.  This can be  equated to a classic example of non-application of mind by the public authorities.  This lack of foresight  shall manifest in the future when it will be too late if the elevated Metro – II is constructed on these roads.  The Commercial / Financial capital of India will be crippled devastatingly forever for the aforesaid reasons resulting in massive economic loss for the City.

<!--[if !supportLists]-->3.    <!--[endif]-->Elevated Metro Rail at the centre of the existing roads was never planned and contemplated by both Mumbai Municipal Corporation and the State Government in the Urban Development Department at the time of preparing and then sanctioning the Development Plan of Greater Mumbai and the Regional Plan.  The land use maps of these authorities does not provide for construction of elevated Metro Rail on the public roads shown on the maps.  These roads and their widths were planned after detailed Survey evaluations of the traffic then existing and the anticipated future increase as rationally estimated.  No city in the World has an elevated Metro Rail on 90’ to 120’ congested Road which are encroached and that too with commercial / shopping  areas at stations at a height of 80’ to 100’ as proposed in Metro – II.  It is surprising to note that Mumbai Municipal Corporation, which is the implementing authority of the Development Plan as also the  owner of the roads is mutely observing this.  It is high time the Government / MMRDA and Municipal Corporation realize the mess and devastation the elevated Metro – II with create in the areas along which the elevated Metro – II will ply.  Mumbai Municipal Corporation which is the Local Planning Authority ought to have objected to use their roads to accommodate elevated Metro Rail as the same was never planned under both the Development Planning 1962 and 1991.

<!--[if !supportLists]-->4.    <!--[endif]-->Another very glaring / serious flaw of the elevated Metro – II relates to Fire Safety and security of the citizens and the commuters of the Metro Rail.  This is a very crucial aspect of any Metro Rail, which runs through City; more so because of spate of railway accidents, derailment’s and increasing terrorist attacks which have led to loss of life and property.  It seems the project proponents have treated this issue in a “Cavalier” fashion all along.  In emergency event the ambulance will not be able to reach hospital in time resulting in loss of life of the patient.  In fact safety, fire and security aspects need to be addressed and analyzed in depth by experts in the field at the beginning itself before sanctioning the project. 

       All the Metro stations extend over the entire width of the road and come in dangerous / close proximity of 5’ to 10’ from the existing structures at many places blocking their light and ventilation as these stations have height varying from 80’ to 100’.  Each station has commercial built up area of 4000 m2 at the top.  Station being  an “Assembly” Building where people gather, it is mandatorily required to provide an open to sky court yard  of at least 20’.0” around every elevated Metro – II stations for movement of Fire Engine in case of fire.  Metro Rail will ply at an elevated level and if fire occurs in via –duct at location between two stations, the evacuation of commuters will be a problem and for that matter evacuation of people from stations also.  The existing buildings will be at a close proximity of only 5’ to 10’ from the Railway Station and will be exposed to  fire risk if fire takes place in the station.  Apart from the safety/security risk, the residents all along the Metro Rail will be exposed to loss of privacy and sleeplessness due to noise pollution created by Metro Rail passing every 5 minutes, activities of anti-social elements etc.  Fire Safety and security aspect are completely and conveniently ignored / overlooked.  It is mandatory that no compromise is tolerated at all while insisting upon compliance of Fire Safety norms and ensuring general safety and security of citizens.  As we understand, the Chief Fire Officer who enforces the fire safety norms prescribed in Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act 2006 has not yet granted any clearance to the elevated Metro – II.  No where in the World Metro station is constructed in such close distance of 5’ to 10’ from Residential Buildings & other inhabited structures.  Hence it is our say that the contentions above shall be kept in mind without fail while dealing with application for N.O.C. of C.F.O. when submitted by M.M.R.D.A.  If any untoward incident of Fire takes place resulting in loss of life and property on account of any laxity in this regard, the concerned authorities and executors of the project shall be responsible and liable to face criminal action and consequences thereof as provided in Law.
        Further, very heavy traffic will be generated at Metro Stations.  Autos  and Taxis will halt at all stations for pick up / alighting Metro Commuters resulting in frequent stoppage of traffic.  Also there are no parking area available in the vicinity of practically at all the stations.  There will be utter chaos at the Metro stations.  In addition hawkers would surely add to the woes of the public.  Also no provision of private car, Taxi, Auto and 2 wheeler parkings is available at most of the proposed Metro stations each having office commercial built-up area of 43000 sft. The mess that would be created at all the proposed Metro station will be unimaginable.  The quality of the life of citizen of entire Western Suburbs will deteriorate / become pitiable.
                
<!--[if !supportLists]-->5.            <!--[endif]--> Along the alignment, the Metro Rail Track is required to negotiate several curvatures en-route to change the travel direction.  At all such curvatures the track runs across the existing occupied structures.  This will necessitate acquisition of the property at a very heavy cost and then demolish these to accommodate the via – duct / track.  This will also lead to mass displacement of the citizens causing injustice to them for no fault on their part.  There are about eight to ten such curves where there will be massive displacement of people, which is obviously not desirable. 

<!--[if !supportLists]-->6.            <!--[endif]--> As stated hereinabove the construction of the elevated Metro – II would require construction of approximately 10,00,000 m2 (1,07,64,000 sq.ft) built-up area.  Consisting of Metro Stations, Metro Yards, commercial areas, via-ducts etc., being one continuous structure.  This will require obtaining prior (EC) Environmental Clearance from the Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India as per the Notification No.1533 E of 14-09-2006.  The said prior (EC) has not been obtained by MMRDA as yet.  Metro Yards have growth of Mangroves, which are classified as CRZ – I under the CRZ Notification No. S.O. 19(E) of 06-01-2011 issued by the Ministry of Environment, Government of India.  No construction can be permitted in CRZ – I as  per the said Notification.  In fact MCZMA (Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority) has refused to give clearance to the Metro Yards at Charkop and Mankhurd because of CRZ – I classification.  In addition to this several important public amenities / open space are affected by Metro yards.  As it is, the available open spaces are far below the norms and these open spaces Development Plan reservations of  Recreation ground and play Grounds should not be reduced further.  In fact such reservation need to be increased to take care of the increase in the population much beyond the estimated figure considered at the time of sanctioning the Development Plan 1991-2011. 
      In the  present context we may refer to the proposal submitted by M.M.R.D.A. to the Urban Development Department wherein several lands are proposed to be reserved for various Metro Mono Rail Yards to be located on lands that are at present reserved for public amenities of Play Grounds, Recreation Grounds, Schools, Markets, Government Staff Quarters, Education Complexes, Markets etc. The proposal contemplates deletion of these public amenities to the exclusion of Recreation Grounds and Play Grounds to make room for the Metro Yards.  Even the Recreation Grounds / Play Grounds which are to be retained have been shifted / relocated at places that are already  encroached by buildings and hutment colonies or in No Development Zone.  Hence these will remain on paper only.

     It is also a fact that present population has already exceeded the estimated population considered by providing public amenities in the sanctioned Development Plan of 1991/2011.  As a result the D.P.  reservations of these amenities is already falling short of the requirements.  In fact such amenities need to be increased to provide for the future growth in population and to be considered at the time of preparation of the Revised Development Plan for 2012 to 2032, which is under preparation.

     Most importantly all Mangroves have been notified as “Forest” under Indian Forest Act 1927 under the orders of the Hon’ble High Court Mumbai in the W.P. (PIL) No.3246 of 2004.  Being so the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 shall apply to the lands of Metro Yard and Non-Forest activity is not  permissible on it.  Land on which Charkop and Makhurd Yards are proposed are covered with thick Mangrove Forests.

      In the above circumstances, it is our say that if at all the Metro Rail is to be constructed, it can ply underground as is done / as is being done in the Metropolitan cities World over.  This will not disturb / interfere with the existing road  net work or any utility services and will also keep in reserve the scope of improving the same in future when traffic volume is sure to increase.  It is observed that the traffic volume almost doubles in about 10 years.  It is absolutely necessary that the present net-work of roads should be kept in tact for future needs and improvement by construction of flyovers.  Due to the easy availability of cars and improvement in the quality of life, the vehicular traffic goes on increasing at a very fast rate, which cannot be ignored.  In fact general public interest unanimously demands underground Metro Rail.  It is not understood why the said demand is being rejected without even studying the feasibility thereof.  We contend that an underground Metro would be far citizen friendly and more urban planning / environment complaint.  This has led us to believe that underground Metro is rejected for an obvious reason that it will give lesser profit to the concessionaire.  Surely this consideration should not be allowed to prevail over the larger interest of public safety security and other advantages / welfare of the citizens.

      Lastly it is to state that the so-called benefits / advantages / merits of an elevated Metro Rail – II as proposed (though not admitted) are liable to be completely set side / overshadowed by the horrendous adverse effects and negative impact it will have on the traffic and environment of the City and the lives and properties of citizens including mass displacement of people and demolition of the existing residential buildings at curvatures as also the basic existing infrastructure of the City.

     It is our sincere understanding that the authorities cannot and would not be immune and insensitive to the stated grave problems of the traffic congestion, safety and security  of the citizens and commuters, noise and environmental pollution , inconvenience etc., and including massive population displacements that would be caused if the elevated Metro is constructed as proposed.  The elevated Metro – II project is surely a brain child of bankrupt minds of the face of it.  It is liable and hence  required to be scraped to prevent devastation of the quality of life of its citizens.

     To recapitulate our say in nut shell, the elevated Metro Rail – II from Charkop – Mankhurd via Bandra in the present form will be disastrous and against the larger public interest, especially citizens of the Western and Eastern Suburbs as it is fraught with countless flaws  enlisted above and as it is proposed without proper application of mind on the part of planners who have completely ignored its adverse implications on the future need of traffic on the existing road network and the need  of improvement in future to give relief to vehicular traffic which is going to surely increase in the same proportion of increase in the population of the Western Suburbs.  No detailed traffic study has been carried out by experts in the field of Traffic Engineering.  The present planners shall be held solely responsible for the sad state of traffic congestion that will occur if the elevated Metro – II is constructed over these roads -  in addition to the danger caused to the public being exposed to fire, safety and security problems mentioned above.

     Further to this, proximity of the Metro Rail to the existing buildings of all types of occupation of residential, commercial, educational, institutional etc., will be exposed to serious terrorist attacks  that have  increased presently.  Surely the State Government would not like to be associated with such scheme which is fraught with technical / planning flaws as also exposing the citizens to countless problems and endless sufferings enumerated hereinbefore in addition to massive demolition of existing buildings and displacement of citizens as mentioned above.

       Most importantly the entire Elevated Metro – II violates provisions of multiple legislations and regulations viz. (a) Maharashtra Region Town Planning Act, 1966 & D.C. Regulations framed thereunder (b) Environment (Protection) Act 1986  & rules framed thereunder (3) Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act 1888 (4) Constitution of India (5) Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety measures Act 2006 (6) The Air Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1981 (7)  CRZ Notification dated 06-01-2011 (8) EIA Notification of 14-09-2006.  It can be termed as classic example of a project which is misconceived, impractical, hazardous, against larger public interest and non-complaint of the provisions of the relevant laws and legislations.
Under these circumstances Underground Metro is the only option available which shall not only integrate other modes of transport and whatever investments made today by the government shall positively benefit the future generations.
        It is therefore our humble request and seek your honour’s timely intervention in the matter of our grave concern stated above.  It is sincerely hoped that our above submission will be considered and relief is given to the citizens. 
Yours faithfully, 
P.S. :   What is stated apprehensively above of deliberated devastation of the city by MMRDA is already been demonstrated in the ongoing execution of Metro I (Versova-Ghatkopar) as well as Mono Rail project (Wadal-Chembur Route).

It is shocking that a small stretch of 11 km. of Metro I is under construction for last four years and is now curtailed to just 3 kms., making a mockery of public trust and exchequers money. There is no hope that remaining 8 km.s will see light of the day in present circumstances.

The Mono Rail project is comparatively much smaller in  volume and complexities, has also elapsed all possible deadlines that too with  massive over-runs in costs.

Even a simple project like skywalks had to be abandoned by MMRDA due to lack of planning and absence of foresight, resulting in destroying of sublime streets of the suburbs.

Yours Sincerely,

For Save our Suburbs


Sherley J Singh
(Convener Core Committee)
9821035469




Tuesday, August 2, 2011

DNA - 1/8/2011 - Crucial Metro II meeting today in Mumbai

Crucial Metro II meeting today in Mumbai
Published: Monday, Aug 1, 2011, 10:00 IST 
By Ninad Siddhaye | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA
It has been almost two years after the Bhoomipujan ceremony for the 32km-long Metro-II alignment was performed in the presence of President Pratibha Patil in Mumbai. However, officials of the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMOPL) are still struggling to hand over the land needed for the casting yard on both sides of the Charkop-Bandra-Mankhurd stretch. The metropolitan commissioner has convened a meeting on Monday of all stakeholders to discuss the issue.
The Charkop-Bandra-Mankhurd route is to be the biggest metro routes in the city. Just like the first metro, Reliance Infrastructure-led consortium Mumbai Metro Transport Pvt Ltd (MMTPL) has bagged the contract to construct and run the metro for around three decades.
However, not even a single brick has been laid on this route. As part of their face-saving exercise, MMRDA and MMTPL officials have been claiming that the “geotechnical surveys” and soil testing for the route has been in progress. However, according to sources close to the development, no civil work is possible until land for the casting yard is made available. “How can the consortium start any work when there is absolutely no land in our possession where we can commence construction?” asked a source close to the development.
MMRDA spokesperson Dilip Kawathkar told DNA that the central government’s Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has given an “in principle” approval to acquiring both the plots in Charkop and Mankhurd. “We have already made a formal plea to the centre in granting us an environmental clearance. We should be getting it soon,” said Kawathkar. However, sources in the authority have confirmed that getting the nod to construct car depots in a Coastal Regulatory Zone (CRZ) area is likely to be very tough for the authority.

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Nitin Killawala - Response TOI Report “METRO OPENING PUSHED BACK TO JULY 2012” on 14.6.2011

__________________________________________________________________________________
Refers TOI Report “METRO OPENING PUSHED BACK TO JULY 2012”
__________________________________________________________________________________

As predicted by Citizen groups, VAG route is having no ray of hope of completion and gradually heading towards a dead end!

5 simple questions we must ask amongst ourselves:

Q1      What punishment should be given to the Authorities and PPP partners for non-complying of their promised time schedule of December 2010?
Q2     The Economic loss for the exchequer due to delay (as per DPR-Nov. 2006) is around Rs. 44 crores per month, out of which the fuel loss itself attributes to Rs. 20 crore per month. How this huge incremental amount be ever compensated?
Q3     Why media perpetually supports the irresponsible statements by the authorities?
Q4     Why should the exchequer suffer for deliberately destroying their quality of life?
Q5     What line of action should be enforced, if even July 2012 dead line is defaulted? 

Please be vigilant, our city is systematically getting destroyed not by any outsiders but by our own Civil Authorities!

Your response awaited …….
-- 

Nitin Killawala.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Artical

Metro opening pushed back - Times of India - 14.6.11
Jun 14, 2011, 05.52am IST TNN[ Ashley D’Mello ]MUMBAI: 

The citizens’ wait to take their first ride on the Metro just got longer. Instead of the earlier promised date of March 2012, it will be in July that the Versova-Andheri-Ghatkopar route will be thrown open. 

This is the third time that the inauguration for the 12-km route date has been changed. 

In fact, the change in date was not announced; it was a poster at the Metro site near the new Lalbaug flyover, which stated the completion date as July 2012. 

Officials of the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA), the planning authority for Metro, admitted that the inauguration would be delayed. An official said it had to be pushed back owing to the slow progress in work on the line as well as stations. “Trial runs on a part of the tracks are likely to begin by the end of the year. After that, changes will have to be made to ensure that all safety standards are met with. This is why the date could be extended to ensure that everything goes smoothly when the trains finally start running,” they said. 

MMRDA chief Rahul Asthana recently threw a hint of the impending delay when he promised to try and complete the work but did not set a deadline. 

Though critical of the constant change in the date of inauguration, the transport circles agreed that the agencies met quite a few challenges to build the lines. “The railways has only recently granted the MMOPL the permission to build a bridge over the Western Railway tracks near Andheri station. The task of constructing another bridge over the Jog Flyover on the Western Express Highway is Herculean. These constructions will take some time,” an official said. The Mumbai Metro One Private Ltd (MMOPL) is laying the tracks. 

An MMRDA official said the delay was due to slow progress in work on the tracks as well as stations

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Letter to Shri Jairam Ramesh on - Prior Environmental Clearance (EC) under the notification No.S.O. 1533 (E) of 14-09-2006 for construction project / Activity of Mumbai Metro II from Charkop to Mankhurd via Bandra.

 8th June, 2011

To
Shri Jairam Ramesh
Hon’ble Minister
Ministry of Environment & Forests
Paryavarn Bhawan, C.G.O Complex
Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003.

Sub:   (i) Prior Environmental Clearance (EC) under the notification No.S.O. 1533 (E) of 14-09-2006 for construction project / Activity of Mumbai Metro II from Charkop to Mankhurd via Bandra.
Sir,

We are concerned citizens.

Mumbai Metro – II contemplates to construct 32 km distance elevated Metro Rail from Charkop to Mankhurd having total 27 Metro Stations en route.  The scheme also proposes to construct 4000 m2 commercial / offices above every metro station and to construct Metro yards at Charkop and Mankhurd.  All the Metro Stations are connected by R.C.C. viaduct over which the Metro Tracks are to be laid for the Rail to ply.  A schematic plan showing Sections of a Metro Station, commercial floor over it, concourse level floor and the viaduct is annexed hereto.  The construction built-up area of the project is calculated to be as under:-

(a)   Metro Stations area              27 x 200  x 21.6 x 3     =   3,49,920 m2
(b)            Viaduct                                27000m   x 12 m         =   3,24,000 m2       
(c)             Metro yards                         *200000  x 2               =   4,00,000 m2   
                                                                                                10,73,920 m2

*Approximate

Reference is kindly requested to Sr.No.8 (a) of the schedule of activities that require prior environmental clearance under the Notification No. S.O. 1533E dated 14-09-2006 issued by Government of India in the Ministry of Environment & Forests.  It provides that construction projects involving built-up area of more than 1,50,000 m2 shall be undertaken only after obtaining the prior environmental clearance (EC) from the Central Government in the Ministry of Environment & Forest.
   
Considering the provisions of the aforestated Notification of 14-09-2006 Mumbai Metrol Rail II project which involves huge construction activity built-up area of about 10,73,920 m2 cannot be undertaken without obtaining prior environmental clearance (EC) from the Central Government in the Ministry of Environment  & Forests.  The same involves studying Environmental Impact Assessment and also public consultation. 

As per the information obtained from the Ministry of  Environment & Forests, Government of India under RTI Act, 2005, no prior environment clearance (EC) is obtained by the State Government / project executing agency appointed by the Government i.e. MMRDA to undertake construction of Mumbai Metro II.

In the above premises, your intervention is requested to this very important aspect of the entire Mumbai Metro II Scheme i.e. obtaining prior environmental clearance prior to starting any work.

Thanking you in anticipation

For Save Our Suburbs

  
Sherley J Singh
Convenor - Citizens Core Committee
9821035469

 Acc : As Above.   

  
----------------------------------------------------------------------Supported by---------------------------------------------
1.          AGNI (Action for Good Governance and Networking in India)
17.     Jagrut Nagrik Manch
2.          ALM - 144
18.     Janhit Manch
3.          Andheri Shopkeepers and Residents Welfare Association 
19.     Jan Seva Mandal
4.       AVRA (Andheri-Versova Welfare Residents Association)
5.          Awaaz Foundation
21.     Juhu Scheme Residents Association
6.          Bandra Bandstand Residents Trust
22.     JVPD Co-op Housing Asso. Ltd
7.          Bandra West Residents Association
8.          Citispace
24.     JVPD Tenants & Residents Asso.
9.          F-North ward Citizens' Federation
25.     Khar-Bandra-Santacruz Foundation
10.      Federation Of Retail Traders Welfare Association
26.     Khar Residents Association
11.      Forum for Improving Quality of Life in Mumbai Suburbs
27.     Linking Road Citizens Forum
12.      GARAJ
28.     Mumbai Environment Social Network (MESN)
13.      Gulmohar Area Societies Welfare Group
29.     Nagriksatta
14.      Guzdar Scheme Residents Trust
30.     Pali Hill Residents Association
15.      H-West Federation
31.     Vileparle West Vyapari Welfare Association
16.      Irla Residents Association
32.   Vithal Nagar Society 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Letter to Narinder Nayar,Mumbai First by Deepak Kantawala


30th May 2011
Mr. Narinder Nayar,
President,
Mumbai First

Dear Mr. Nayar,

I am sure that you are aware of the fact that Citizens Groups from Borivali to Bandra are extremely concerned about the way the Metro Project from Charkop to Mankhurd via Bandra is being handled by MMRDA.

Unfortunately all our concerns are being brushed aside and rather than logically arguing and mitigating the concerns, the MMRDA,  is resorting to  a barrage of dis-information through the press.
As an environmental consultant with more than 40 years of experience in the field, I am amazed and shocked that a project costing more than Rs. 10,000 crores and which will have enormous impact on the lives of millions of people, is exempted from conducting comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) taking shelter in some obscure and century old legal provision!

More than 8000 citizens from across the country sent a petition to the Prime Minister and the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) requesting them to include all Metro projects within the ambit of EIA to no avail.

Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai has prepared a comprehensive report on the feasibility of underground Metro and shown its advantages as compared to elevated Metro. Eminent urban planners and architects have spent years doing research on such Metros around the world and prepared plans for underground metro and alternative routes. Whenever these were presented to MMRDA the response is not a logical rebuttal of these arguments but evasive answers and refusal to examine the issues raised.

We are dismayed at the cavalier, almost arrogant, attitude of MMRDA, when such huge amounts of public money is to be spent and the consequences of the project would be felt forever by the citizens of Mumbai.
I would like to request you to give an opportunity to the Indian Environmental Association along with urban planners and architects to make a presentation to Mumbai First so that Mumbai First could take up the issue of EIA with the Government of India.

Thanking you and with kind regards,

Deepak Kantawala

Reply to MoEF by Deepak Kantawala


30th May 2011
Mr. Bharat Bhushan,
Director (IA-III),
Ministry of Environment & Forests,
Paryavaran Bhavan,
CGO Complex,
Lodhi Road,
New Delhi-110 003

Sub: Environmental Impact Assessment and Metro Projects
Ref: Your Letter F.NO. 20-83/2011-IA-III dated the 9th of May 2011

Dear Shri Bharat Bhushan,

I am in possession of an RTI reply from your office dated 9th May 2011 in response to few queries raised by a Citizen Group regarding Metro Line II in Mumbai. I am writing this letter as an environmental engineer with more than 40 years of experience in the field of environmental engineering, to express my dismay at not subjecting the Mumbai Metro project to a comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).

We are aware that the Railway and Metro Projects are not listed under the schedule of activities/projects in the EIA Notification, 2006 and do not require prior environmental clearance. The question is about the rationale for such exclusion.

A large number of concerned citizens had submitted a petition requesting the Ministry of Environment and Forests to include the Metro Projects in the Schedule to no avail. It is difficult, if not impossible, to understand the logic behind this exemption to a project that is expected to have significant environmental and socioeconomic impacts and would affect the lives of millions of people.

Environmental Impact Assessment is the only tool that will provide a priori assessment of environmental and socio-economic impacts, will permit a formalized public consultation and require the formulation of an Environmental Management Plan to mitigate and minimize the impacts.

We also are not able to comprehend, how a piece meal environmental clearance to commercial components would mitigate the overall impact. We do not know how environmental clearance would be processed for these “ components”. Would that be based on EIAs limited to the “components?” Is it not more appropriate to undertake a comprehensive EIA of the entire project rather than “adding up the” component clearances? In fact my understanding is that almost all the international funding agencies like the World Bank, Asian Development Bank etc. insist that if a component of a project requires an EIA the entire project must be subjected to the EIA. This seems to be a logical recommendation.

How would the following questions agitating the minds of citizens, and which are part of a comprehensive EIA, be answered?
  1.  Is there a Master Plan for Mumbai Transportation  including the existing network of suburban trains, buses, private transport, proposed water transport etc.?
  2.  Metro the only alternative and does it form a component of such a master Plan?
  3. Which of the two alternative approaches, over ground or underground, would have minimum environmental and socio-economic impacts and long term advantage of phased expansion?
  4. What alternatives routes are possible and which would have the least impact?
  5. Have the people expected to be affected consulted and have their inputs considered dispassionately?
When irrigation projects, highways, housing projects and even sewage treatment plants and sewage disposal systems have to undergo EIA it is truly amazing, if not mind boggling, that a project estimated to cost thousands of crores of rupees and impact millions of lives is exempted!

I would once again request you to subject the Metro Projects across the country and especially in Mumbai to a comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment.

Thanking you,

Very truly yours,


(Deepak Kantawala)